DISFEMISME DALAM SOSIAL MEDIA TWITTER PADA TAGAR #BubarkanReuniKadrun212
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nowadays, dysphemism is widely found on social media. This paper will examine the dysphemism found on Twitter social media. The problem will focus on discussing the types of dysphemism used. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The research data is in the form ofssentences that are considered to contain dysphemism. The data sources for this research are words or posts with the hashtag #BubarkanReuniKadrun212 on Twitter social media. The data collection method used is the method of reading and taking notes. The data analysis method used is the "agih" method with the direct element technique, the "lesap" technique, and the replacement technique. The results of data analysis are presented by informal methods. Based on therresults offdata analysis, it was concluded that the types of dysphemism found were 1) taboo terms used for cursing, objects, and attacks, 2) obscene expletives, 3) comparisons of humans with animals considered to have certain behaviors, 4) terms derived from tabooed body organs, body effluvia (smell or secretions), and sexual behavior, 5) nicknames taken from physical character that look as if they are abnormal people, 6) nicknames that use terms from mental abnormalities or mental illnesses, 7) sexist dysphemism, racist, speciesist, classist, ageist, and words ending in the other -ist who works as, and 8) the party who looks at each other towards the intended character.
Article Details
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism & dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.
Ans, A. H. L., Devi, E. K., Masdita, F. I., & Ardiansyah, M. A. (2020). Disfemisme pada Unggahan Akun Twitter Areajulid. CaLLs, 6(2), 254–266.
Ashghor, A. (2021). Taliban di Afghanistan: Tinjauan Ideologi, Gerakan dan Aliansinya dengan ISIS. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, VII(1), 71–83.
Badan Bahasa. (2016). Hasil Pencarian - KBBI Daring. Kemendikbud. https://kbbi.kem dikbud.go.id/entri/anjing
Bako, E. N. (2018). Budaya Popular dan Komunikasi: Penggunaan Disfemia Para Netizen pada Akun Instagram Lambe_Turah. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Khasan, A. M., Sumarwati, & Setiawan, B. (2014). Pemakaian Disfemisme dalam Berita Utama Surat Kabar Joglo Semar. BASASTRA: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, Dan Pengajarannya, 2(3), 1–12.
Nisak, K., Bahry, R., & Mahmud, S. (2018). Disfemisme Bahasa Aceh Dalam Tuturan Anak-Anak Di Gampong Ulee Lhat, Montasik, Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan PBSI, 3(2), 164–172.
Putra, D. M. L. (2018). Fenomena Disfemisme Kebahasaan dalam Kolom Komentar Akun Instagram @Lambe_Turah sebagai Bahan Ajar Bahasa Indonesia Siswa SMP. Universitas Muhammad Surakarta.
Putri, M. I. D. (2017). Disfemisme pada Kolom Komentar di Akun Media Sosial Instagram @Jokowi. Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Diandra Primamitra.
Ying, Y., Mursitama, T. N., & Rumeser, J. A. A. (2017). Comparison of animal idioms in
Chinese and Indonesian. Advanced Science Letters, 23(2), 1167–1170. https:// doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7530