APAKAH MODEL SEPAK BOLA MODERN TELAH GAGAL?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This writing aims to measure and explore how neoliberal values in the modern football system can find their synthesis point on the European continent as well as in Indonesia. Modern football has a background of bourgeoisie, commodification practices, and also commercialization that shifts the authentic values of football. By using a literature review approach in the form of studying the theories and substance of previous authorship which is used as a guide in the analysis process. The results of the discussion describe analytically the typology of supporters, case studies of supporter activism in Europe, discussion of the idea of modern football in Indonesia, and case studies of recommendations. Progress in the modern football order cannot be felt by all football fans, the modern football order should be able to create progress that can be felt inclusively, not exclusively.
Article Details
References
Boyle R and Haynes R. (2009). Power Play: Sport, the Media and Popular Culture.
Castells M. (2010). The Power of Identity.
Clarke J. (1978). Football and working class fans: Tradition and change. In: Ingham R (ed.) Football Hooliganism: The Wider Context. London: Inter-Action. 37–60.
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2019). Collective psychological resilience: A multilevel approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(5), 470-475.
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From paper to the internet.
Fitzpatrick, D., & Hoey, P. (2022). From fanzines to foodbanks: Football fan activism in the age of anti-politics. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(8), 1234–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902221077188
García, B., & Llopis-Goig, R. (2020). Club-militants, institutionalists, critics, moderns and globalists: A quantitative governance-based typology of football supporters. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 55(8), 1116–1135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690219868661
Giulianotti, R. (2002). SUPPORTERS, FOLLOWERS, FANS, AND FLANEURS A Taxonomy of Spectator Identities in Football. In JOURNAL OF SPORT & SOCIAL ISSUES.
Hasyim I. (2021, February 11). Begini Jejak kontroversial Nurdin Halid di Kancah Sepak Bola Nasional. Sport.Tempo.CO.
Karl Marx. (1867). Capital. A Critique of Political Economy, 1(1954).
Kennedy, D., & Kennedy, P. (2010). Towards a Marxist political economy of football supporters. Capital & Class, 34(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816810365520
Lutz T. (2005, February 10). United protestors rage at Glazer. The Guardian.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2021). Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press.
Millward P and Poulton G. (2014). Football fandom, mobilization and Herbert Blumer: A social movement analysis of FC United of Manchester. Sociology of Sport Journal.
Noveanto E. (2022, January 20). Mengapa Banyak Dualisme Di Klub Sepakbola Indonesia? GOAL. Numerato, D. (2015). Who Says “No to Modern Football?” Italian Supporters, Reflexivity, and
Neo-Liberalism. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 39(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723514530566
Quick S. (2000). Contemporary sport consumers: Some implications of linking fan typology with key spectator variables. .
Redhead S. (1993). The Passion and the Fashion: Football Fandom in New Europe.
Sulistiyono. (2012). Transformasi Pengelolaan Klub Sepak bola Di Indonesia. Jurnal Media Ilmu Keolahragaan Indonesia. Volume 2. Edisi 2. Desember 2012. ISSN: 2088-680.
Slater, T. (2017). The Eviction of Critical Perspectives from Gentrification Research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(2), 344-354.
TGIPF. (2022, October 17). LAPORAN TIM GABUNGAN INDEPENDEN PENCARI FAKTA TRAGEDI
STADION KANJURUHAN MALANG. Kementerian Koordinator Bidan Politik, Hukum, Dan Keamanan Republik Indonesia.
When Saturday Comes. (1992, February). “Editorial: Playing Away.”
Yosia A. (2020, April 3). Flashback Liga Indonesia: Noda Hitam Dualisme Kompetisi 2010-2012, Jangan Sampai Terulang Lagi! BOLA.COM.